M/S Vikash Engineering Company And ANR v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2802 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10735 of 2011 ===========================================================
1. M/s Vikash Engineering Company through its Managing Partner Sanjay Kumar son of Late Rajmani Prasad, resident of 124B/Road No. 2, Rajendra Nagar, Patna - 800016.
2. Sanjay Kumar son of Late Raj Mani Sinha, R/o Mohalla - Rajendra Nagar, P.S. - Kadam Kuan, District - Patna.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The Union of India through Financial Advisor and Chief Administrative, Works Project, East Central Railway, Chamber Bhawan, J.C. Road, Patna.
2. Dinesh Kumar, son of not known, Chief Administrative Officer, Workshop Project, Chamber Bhawan, J.C. Road, Patna.
3. Shiv Kumar Prasad, son of not known, Deputy Chief Engineer-IV, Workshop Project, Chamber Bhawan, J.R. Road, Patna.
4. Santosh Kumar Sinha, son of not known, Asstt. E.N. III, Central Railways Workshop Project, Patna.
5. Kundan Kumar, son of not known, S.S.E. (Works), CRWP, Harnaut. .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the judgment of this Court dated 21.04.2016 passed in CWJC No. 10735 of 2011.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits
Patna High Court MJC No.2802 of 2016 dt.04-10-2017 2/2 that the order of this Court stands complied with in terms of the speaking order dated 24.08.2016 (Annexure-A to the show cause) by which the final bill of Rs. 12,77,395/- has been paid to the petitioner. Further, in terms of the Memorandum dated 18.08.2017 (Annexure-G to the supplementary show cause), an amount of Rs. 2,209/- has also been found to be payable to the petitioner by way of interest which has since been paid.
4. In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 2802 of 2016 stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case it is aggrieved by the order of the authorities as noticed above, it may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised.
(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 06.10.2017 Transmission Date N.A.