Nagendra Chandara Banshi @ Nagendra Chandravanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19184 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2024 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Nagendra Chandara Banshi @ Nagendra Chandravanshi Son of Late Raj Narain Chandrabanshi Resident of village- Karkat Bigaha, Ps- Paliganj, Dist- Patna 2.

Naredra Chandara Banshi @ Narendra Chandra Vnshi @Tootu Chandravanshi @ Tooddu Chandravanshi son of Late Raj Narain Chandrabanshi Resident of village- Karkat Bigaha, Ps- Paliganj, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 455 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126, 115(2), 118, 109, 103, 352 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had earlier moved this Court seeking regular bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 28821 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 06.08.2025 on the ground that petitioner is the assailant of the brother of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19184 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 charges against the petitioner have been framed and three witnesses have been examined, on which the learned APP submits that since charges have been framed against the petitioner and the trial has commenced and petitioner is alleged to be the assailant of the brother of the informant, hence it is not a fit case for granting bail to the petitioner.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the instant regular bail application stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T