← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23444/2024bail granted

Sundrm Chaudhary @ 4g v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-08Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23444 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-660 Year-2023 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sundrm Chaudhary @ 4g SON OF RAJEEV CHAUDHARY @ RAJEEV RANJAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- WARD NO. 9, SURSAND MAIDAN, PO- SURSAND, PS- SURSAND, DIST- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Shanu For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-07-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 660 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Section 144 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b) a of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, on secret information, the police personnel came at the house of the petitioner. On search, a mobile phone from pocket of petitioner's shirt, whereas an illegal country-made pistol from his right waist pocket is said to have been recovered.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that there is allegation that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23444 of 2024(3) dt.08-07-2024 2/2 the petitioner was arrested with a country-made pistol but as a matter of fact, the entire allegation is false. He was arrested in Sursand P.S. Case No. 618 of 2023 and he was remanded in this case. He has also submitted that the petitioner is under custody since 30.11.2023.

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 660 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T