← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/164/2014dismissed

Nutan Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-02Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.164 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Nutan Devi Wife Of Dileep Kumar Mahto Resident Of Village- Nimakol, P.O.- Dandkhora, P.S.- Dandkhora, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Welfare, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Department Of Social Welfare, Government Of Bihar, Patna

4. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea, Bihar

5. The District Magistrate, Katihar

6. The District Programme Officer, Katihar

7. The Child Development Project Officer, Block Dandhkhora, District- Katihar

8. The Block Development Officer, Block Dandkhora, District- Katihar

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Sauriya, Block Dandkhora, District- Katihar

10. The Ward Commissioner, Ward No. 08, Gram Panchayat Raj Sauriya, Dandkhora Block, Katihar

11. Ambika Kumari Wife Of Sitaram Mahto Resident Of Village- Nimakol, P.O.- Dandkhora, P.S.- Dandkhora, District- Katihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Digvijay Pratap Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP 18 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-02-2015 With a clear and categorical finding emerging in the adjudication made by the District Magistrate, Katihar in the manner the selection of the petitioner has been done earlier has been dealt with in quite a detail in the impugned order contained in Annexure4. Since the object and purpose of selection of Aanganbari Sevika is to select a person, who is resident of that ward and can deliver the object and purpose of setting up of such centres and provide meal to

Patna High Court CWJC No.164 of 2014 dt.02-02-2015 2/2 the target group and not only providing employment to unemployed, the findings being what they are is not required to be interfered with. If Annexure- 4 is not interfered with then Annexure- 6 has to stand. No interference is required.

Writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U