← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19812/2023bail granted

Mintowali @ Sunaina Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-15Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19812 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2022 Thana- SAHARGHAT District- Madhubani ====================================================== MINTOWALI @ SUNAINA DEVI, Female, aged about 36 years, W/OLALU NAYAK @ LALU YADAV, Village- Kerwa Ps- Sharghat DistMadhubani ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 206 of 2022 for the offence registered under Sections 272, 273/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 638.28 liters wine is said to have been recovered from different vehicles in question.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19812 of 2023(2) dt.15-05-2023 2/3 He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused. The petitioner is a lady. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022, arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3005 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari-Versus-The State of Bihar).

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19812 of 2023(2) dt.15-05-2023 3/3 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below/concerned Court, in connection with Saharghat P.S. Case No. 206 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T