Dhalendra Yadav @ Dhirendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54969 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54969 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2017 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Dhalendra Yadav @ Dhirendra Yadav, Son of Late Hawaldar Yadav, Resident of Village- Saraiya, Police Station- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Singh Shastriji ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 104 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and accused persons is of snatching the money of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Further his name surfaced on confession of co-accused of this case and other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.10.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43605 of 2017 and petitioner has been in custody since 01.09.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54969 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Bhabhua, Kaimur, in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 104 of 2017,subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T