Patna High CourtCWJC/17090/2014dismissed

Priyanka Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-26Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17090 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Priyanka Kumari Wife of Ajay Kumar Sharma resident of village - Baltharwa, Police Station - Piprakothi, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, I.C.D.S., Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

5. The District Programme officer, East Champaran, Motihari

6. The Child Development Project officer, Block, Piprakothi, District - East Champaran .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kuar For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC1- M. K. SINHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The controversy surrounding the selection of an Aangan Bari Sevika has led to holding of Aam Sabha afresh. The materials which the petitioner has relied on to show that the disqualification which she has suffered on account of her father-inlaw is misnomer. The court has gone through the documents. These are very evasive kind of reports and not specific and obviously are either procured or managed.

In view of the same if the respondents have decided to

Patna High Court CWJC No.17090 of 2014 dt.26-02-2015 2/2 initiate a fresh selection process and for which steps have been initiated and taken, let the petitioner participate and try her luck afresh because the impediment created earlier may not come in her way now if what has been stated by the petitioner is correct that her father-inlaw has resigned from the post. The direction in this writ application will not come in the way of the petitioner in her selection in future. Writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) haque/- U