Prabhas Kumar Yadav @ Prakash Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18842 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2021 Thana- JAMALPUR RAIL P.S. DistrictLakhisarai ====================================================== Prabhas Kumar Yadav @ Prakash Kumar Yadav Son Of Rajdeo Yadav Resident Of Village- Pariya, P.S.- Bariyarpur, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with GRP/Jamalpur P.S. Case no. 71 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 401 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, when the informant watched criminal activity at platform and noticed that some persons jumped from the train towards opposite direction and began to flee Away. The police party surrounded and caught one person and rest of them fled away. It is further alleged that on interrogation he disclosed the name of his associates and on search of his bag some ornaments and cash have been recovered. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18842 of 2022(3) dt.18-10-2022 2/2 offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the name of the petitioner has been disclosed in this case on confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Rajeev Kumar. Neither the petitioner was arrested nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with GRP/Jamalpur P.S. Case no. 71 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned R.J.M., Kiul, (Lakhisarai) subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma2203/- U