Subesh Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20182 of 2016 ====================================================== Subesh Kumar Sinha, Son of Ravi Nandan Prasad Sinha, Resident of Dhadiya Belar, P.O.-Karpuri Gram, P.S. Samstipur, District-Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Inspector General of Registration, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
4. The Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
5. The District Sub-Registrar, Samastipur
6. The District Registrar, Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, A.C. to G.A.-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 In the present writ application, the petitioner has sought for quashing Order No.18, contained in Memo No.2812 dated 11.11.2016, issued under the signature of District SubRegistrar, Samastipur, whereby and whereunder he has been directed to accept only those documents, which have been available in the website of the Department.
A counter affidavit has been filed by the State of Bihar (respondent Nos.4 and 5) in this case, in which they have submitted and accepted in sum and substance that no document
Patna High Court CWJC No.20182 of 2016 (6) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 has been refused for registration on the ground that it has not been prepared in the format as available in the website. In view of the submissions made at paragraphs 10 and 12 of the counter affidavit, no further mandamus need be issued as the grievance of the petitioner already stood redressed by the stand taken by the respondents.
The writ application, thus, stands disposed of. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U