Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18047 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2025 Thana- Mehsoul District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh S/O Late Vidyapati Prasad Singh R/O Vill.- Adauri, P.S.- Purnahiya ,Dist.- Sheohar, In FIR dist. is wrongly mention as Dist.- Sitamarhi.
2.
Govind Kumar @ Govind Singh S/O Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh R/O Vill.- Adauri, P.S.- Purnahiya ,Dist.- Sheohar, In FIR dist. is wrongly mention as Dist.- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Madhubala Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 303(2), 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that petitioners went to informant's under construction building and demanded Rupees Two Lakh as ransom money and took Rs.35,000/- on gun point and also assaulted with the butt of the gun.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are father and son and they both have been falsely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18047 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 2/3 implicated in the present case by the informant, who is next door neighbour and with whom there was a dispute. It is submitted that the petitioners never demanded any extortion money and had also not indulged in any theft. It is submitted that the parties have now even entered into a compromise and are not desirous of pursuing the case any further, the certified copy of the compromise petition has been made available by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which is kept on record.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that the petitioners have one antecedent. However, it has been submitted that the petitioners are on bail in the said case and the said case has also been filed at the instance of the present informant.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering that no injury etc., has been suffered by anyone in the incident and eventually a compromise has taken place between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18047 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 3/3 where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mehsoul P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, subject to condition(s) that:
(i) One of the bailors will be their own family member.
(ii) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make themselves available as and when so required, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move cancellation of their bail bond.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T