← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18642/2026bail granted

Rabin Mukhiya @ Ravin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18642 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rabin Mukhiya @ Ravin Kumar Son of Raj Kumar Mukhiya Resident of Village- Bhith, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 125(a), 125(b), 221, 192, 61(2), 263, 324(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner is a young boy aged about 19 years and in sum and substance the allegation is that under the leadership of Ramprit, a mob gathered for freeing the apprehended accused involved in liquor trade and the accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18642 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 2/3 were identified based on video footage.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case with general and omnibus allegation. It is also submitted that petitioner resides nearby the place of occurrence, as such, when ruckus was being created, he out of inquisitiveness came to the place of occurrence and thereafter came to be implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner is a young boy and in the nature of allegation if he sent to judicial custody, his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P. S. Case No.316 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18642 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father namely, Raj Kumar Mukhiya.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T