Ram Naresh Prasad Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7683 of 2016 =========================================================== Ram Naresh Prasad Thakur, S/o Sri Raghunath Prasad Thakur, resident of MohallaSahjanand Colony, Rewa Road, Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur, presently posted as Incharge Headmaster, Middle School Repura, Marwan Block, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The Regional Deputy Director, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

5. The District Magistrate-cum-Chariman of the then District Education Establishment Committee, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur

6. The District Education Officer-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, AC to GA-11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to Annexure-9 submits that case of the petitioner is covered by the decision of this Court dated 02.03.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 118 of 2017 and other cases.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the respondents have to examine the claim of the petitioner and if it is found that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment passed in C.W.J.C. No. 118 of 2017, the respondents may consider the case

Patna High Court CWJC No.7683 of 2016 dt.10-04-2018 2/2 of the petitioner for grant of similar relief. In view of the above, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondent District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur to examine the case of the petitioner and if it is found that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision of this Court (Annexure-9) mentioned herein above, similar benefit should be extended to this petitioner also within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 19.04.2018 Transmission Date