← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33034/2021dismissed

Lal Babu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-26Mr. Justice S. Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33034 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2020 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

LAL BABU SINGH Son of Late Chandrika Singh, aged about 35 years, Male 2.

Om Prakash Singh, Son of Shri Hira Singh, aged about 42 years, Male 3.

Nanhe Singh, Son of Shri Hira Singh, aged about 35 years Male 4.

Sachin Singh Son of Guddu Singh, aged about 22 years, Male, All resident of Village- Barhai Tola, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan, Bihar.

5.

Vinay Singh, Son of Late Singhashan Rai, aged about 50 years, Male Resident of Village- Masanthana, P.S.- Yadavpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Kaushlendra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-10-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that during pendency of this application, petitioner no.4, namely, Sachin Singh has already been apprehended, as such, present petition with respect to petitioner no.4, namely, Sachin Singh has become infructuous and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application as against him. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no.4, namely, Sachin Singh.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33034 of 2021(2) dt.26-10-2021 2/3 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147/ 447/ 341/ 323/ 324/ 325/ 307/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant has alleged that on 25.11.2020 at about 11:00 am, FIR named accused including the petitioners came at his door having rod, talwar, tangi and hasua with intention to kill. Further allegation is that Guddu Singh and Nanhe Singh (petitioner no.3) hold the informant and Lalbabu Singh (petitioner no.1) assaulted him by means of rod causing head injury and injury on left arm. Ramaji Singh assaulted him on back of the head by means of Tangi. Further it is alleged that Guddu Singh assaulted mother of informant by means of talwar on her right hand and Omprakash Singh (petitioner no.2) assaulted by rod on her left hand. Omprakash Singh (petitioner no.

2) assaulted Ravindra Kumar Singh, the younger brother of the informant, by means of rod causing injury on head and Nanhe Singh (petitioner no.3) assaulted him by talwar. Sachin Singh and Vinay Singh (Petitioner no.5) hold Ajit Kumar and Kameshwar Singh assaulted him by tangi causing head injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33034 of 2021(2) dt.26-10-2021 3/3 that they are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case.

However, learned APP submits that the victims have sustained serious injury.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation and injuries, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby dismissed.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T