Sahima Khatoon v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5495 of 2022 ====================================================== Sahima Khatoon Wife of Mohammad Kamran, Resident of Village- Nawada Parsauni, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi. 2.

The Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of India, New Delhi.

3.

The Additional Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi. 4.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7.

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

8.

The Regional Deputy Director, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Gopalganj.

9.

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

10.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj. 11.

The Block Development Officer, Kuchaikot, Gopalganj. 12.

The Block Education Officer, Kuchaikot, Gopalganj. 13.

Bihar School Education Examination Board through its Chairman. 14.

The Examination Controller (Vividh), Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.

15.

The Employment Unit through the Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj, Mateyan Khas, Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj. 16.

The Headmaster, Primary School, Rampur Bhaisahi (Hindi), Mateyan Khas, Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Md. Obaidullah, Advocate For Union of India :

Mr. Arjun Kumar, C.G.C.

For the State :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP-26 For the B.S.E.B.

:

Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.5495 of 2022(3) dt.04-07-2024 2/2 counsels for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner has been terminated from the service.

3. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for disposal of this writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the termination order.

4. The writ petition is disposed of with the liberty, as prayed for.

(Nani Tagia, J) Narendra/- U