Ram Dayal Singh @ Ram Deyal Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18692 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2020 Thana- AGION (GARHANI) District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RAM DAYAL SINGH @ RAM DEYAL SINGH S/o Ram Lochan Singh Resident of Village - Bishambhara, P.S. - Agion, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ramashray Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Agion (G) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
This is second attempt for grant of regular bail on behalf of the petitioner inasmuch as earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 27.4.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. 40255 of 2020 with liberty to renew his prayer for grant of regular bail after nine months if the trial does not show any substantial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18692 of 2022(4) dt.18-05-2022 2/3 progress.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that trial has not progressed and even charges have not been framed. He further submits that the petitioner has remained in custody since 6.6.2020.
This Court vide order dated 20.04.2022 had called for a report from the trial court regarding stage of trial and in pursuance thereof, the report of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-XVIII, Bhojpur at Ara, dated 28.4.2022 is on record and from perusal of the same, it appears that charges could not be framed due to non appearance of the other accused persons on the date fixed for framing of charge.
Having regard to submission made by the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record, the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 6.6.2020 and charges could not be framed, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner after framing of charge. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on regular bail, after framing of charge, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18692 of 2022(4) dt.18-05-2022 3/3 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Agion (G) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2020.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U T