← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28972/2021bail granted

Vinod Kumar @ Binod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-06Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28972 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== VINOD KUMAR @ BINOD KUMAR Son of Late Ganga Ram Resident of Mohalla- Fatehganj, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya at present tenant of duplex House of Arjun Ram Ward No.-15, Murarpur Kalisthan, P.S.- Kotwali, Ditrict- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-06-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Recovery is of 5.84 liters of foreign liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that in fact the recovery was made from the house of one Arjun Ram and the police has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28972 of 2021(2) dt.06-06-2022 2/3 not made an accused of said Arjun Ram. He further submits that in fact the petitioner was not a tenant of said Arjun Ram rather he resides in his own house bearing Holding No.96B, P.I.D. at Ward No.17 and nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No.48 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28972 of 2021(2) dt.06-06-2022 3/3

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T