Nandan Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17822 of 2016 =========================================================== Nandan Kumari, D/o Umesh Chandra Rai, Wife of Vidya Sagar Singh, resident of village + P.O. Chhatauna, P.S. Naokothi, District - Begusarai, presently posted as Prakhand Shikshak (Physical) at up-graded Middle School, Mohiuddinpur - Dondari, Distict - Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The State Council of Education Research and Training, Bihar, Patna through its Director

3. The Director, State Council of Education Research and Training, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Headmaster, up-graded Middle School, Mohtuddinpur, Dandari, District - Begusarai.

5. The Principal, D.P.C.S.S. (Millar) Senior Secondary School, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Madhukar Mishra, AC to SC-16 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT & ORDER Date: 24-11-2017 The petitioner had been appointed as Prakhand Shikshak (Physical), on 14.05.2007, by Prakhand Selection

Patna High Court CWJC No.17822 of 2016 dt.24-11-2017 2/2 Committee, Dendari, in the district of Begusarai, and she is said to be working at up-graded Middle School, Mohtuddinpur.

2. Under a policy decision of the government, it is mandatory for the Prakhand teachers to pass teachers' efficiency test.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that she had applied for the said examination in 2016, but when she appeared for the examination, no questions were there in the question booklet relating to physical education. She has been declared fail. It is the case of the petitioner that she could answer only such questions which she knew and since no question were there from physical education, she could not perform well. The petitioner seeks a direction for publication of her result.

4. In view of petitioner's own saying, this application is devoid of any merit. She herself states that she could not perform well in the examination. There is no question of publication of her result. No relief(s), as sought in the present writ application, can be granted.

5. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. Praveen-II/- (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 06/12/17 Transmission Date N/A