Rajmuna Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19254 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2022 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Rajmuna Devi Wife Of Dharikshan Chaudhary R/O Village- Rampur Naresh, P.S.- Karagahar, District- Rohtas 2.

Dharikshan Chaudhary Son Of Bhukhan Chaudhary R/O Village- Rampur Naresh, P.S.- Karagahar, District- Rohtas 3.

Bintesh Kumar Chaudhary Son Of Dharikshan Chaudhary R/O VillageRampur Naresh, P.S.- Karagahar, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashwani Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry death due to non fulfillment of dowry demand. Petitioners are father-inlaw, devar and mother-in-law of the deceased. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19254 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/3 petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioners are father-in-law, devar and mother-inlaw of the deceased and they have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband. It is further submitted that husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 12.01.2023. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Karagahar P.S. Case No. 252

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19254 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 3/3 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U T