Raj Kumar Rakesh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3685 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2017 Thana -BEUR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Raj Kumar Rakesh, Son of Sri Rama Prasad, Secretary of Good Life Development Society.
2. Pushpa Devi, Wife of Raj Kumar Rakesh, Chairman of Good Life Development Society. Both residents of Nawab Path, Anishabad, P.S. Beur, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2018 Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Beur P.S.Case No. 44 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 420, 467 and 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners, who are Secretary and Chairman of Good Life Development Society, is that they have cheated the informant and others by issuing an advertisement inviting applications along with Bank Draft and date for examination was fixed but it appears that examination on the date fixed was not held and without any examination they have appointed their persons and they have not returned the Bank Draft amount to the informant and others.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3685 of 2018 (2) dt.05-02-2018 2/2 the Society is a registered society and as a matter of fact they have sent SMS to the informant and others for cancellation of examination on the date fixed and thereafter examination was held and appointment was made.
However, learned counsel for the petitioners has failed to show the informant appeared in the examination and failed. Heard learned APP also.
In the facts and circumstances, this is not a case of anticipatory bail, rather petitioners should surrender and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit. With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U