Firangi Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61126 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2017 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Firangi Chaudhary, Son of Late Pachan Chaudhary @ Pachchu Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Bajaur, Tola Mishri Tand, P.S.- Sherghati (Dobhi), District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 09.10.2017 in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2017 for the offence registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire case is based on conjecture and surmises and that there is nothing which can go to show that there is any conspiracy between the father-in-law, mother-in-law and wife Geeta Devi so as to end the life of the son-in-law of the present petitioner. It is further submitted that Geeta Devi wife of Late Upendra Chaudhary who died in his sasural has since been extended the privilege of bail

vide order dated 07.08.0217 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32844 of 2017.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and

make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T