← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/731/2023disposed

Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Chief Secretary,

2024-07-26Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.731 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1767 of 2022 ====================================================== Arvind Kumar Son of Ram Autar Singh Resident of Mohalla - Kharauna Bagicha Near Sahara Office, Police Station - Sampatchak, District -Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, namely Amir Subhani, father's name not known to the petitioner, Govt. Bihar, Patna. 2.

Anand Kishore, father's name not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Animesh Kumar Parasar, father's name not known to the petitioner, the Chief Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 4.

Animesh Kumar Prasar, father's name not known to the petitioner, The Chief Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 5.

Dr. Nurul Haque Shivani, father's name not known to the petitioner The Executive Officer, Azimabad, Circle, Patna, Municipal Corporation, Patna. 6.

Anil Kumar Sinha, father's name not known to the petitioner, The Executive Engineer, Azimabad, Circle, Patna, Municipal Corporation, Patna. 7.

Suraj Kumar, father's name not known to the petitioner, the Revenue Officer, Nagar Palika, Guljarbagh, Patna.

8.

Jitendra Pandey, father's name not known to the petitioner, the Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Kinkar Kumar (Sc9) For PMC :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024 Though the order of this Court dated 17.11.2022, passed in CWJC No.1767 of 2022 has stood complied with, according to the respondent, however the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it has been wrongly concluded by the

Patna High Court MJC No.731 of 2023(2) dt.26-07-2024 2/2 respondent-authorities that the land in question is not a public land, hence the petitioner be granted liberty to avail such remedies as are otherwise available under the law for redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.

2. The petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U