Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27398/2019bail granted

Naushad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-01Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27398 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2018 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Naushad Alam, age 30 yrs., G-Male, S/o Md. Hasim, R/o village - Koilahara Math, P.S. Madhuban, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ansar Ul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-05-2019 Let the defect (s) as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be ignored.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 413, 414 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 09.10.2018 as contained in Annexure 1 with a liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after eight months in custody.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27398 of 2019(2) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 117/2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U