Ramesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22814 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2018 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
RAMESH YADAV Son of Dharma Yadav Resident of Village - Sakuna, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna.
2.
Jattu Yadav Son of Dharma Yadav Resident of Village - Sakuna, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna.
3.
Laxman Yadav @ Laxman Prasad Son of Dharma Yadav Resident of Village - Sakuna, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna. 4.
Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar Son of Jattu Yadav Resident of Village - Sakuna, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Parashuram Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341/323/379/506/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 71 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the thrust of accusation is on other accused persons and not against the petitioners whatsoever. The petitioners are accused in one prior case being Complaint Case No. 13(c) of 2015, in which they are on bail.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22814 of 2019(2) dt.11-04-2019 2/2 each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM III, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 71 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:
i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T