Dinesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60623 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -471 Year- 2017 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ====================================================== Dinesh Chaudhary S/o Daghiwal Chaoudhary Davil Choudhary, R/o Village- Gopalpur, Sakrigali, River Block Ghat, P.S.+Distt.- Sahebganj (Jharkhand).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Dubey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 31.08.2017 in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 356, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that he was apprehended by the local people when he started fleeing away after stealthing the mobile-phone of the informant. It has been submitted that the petitioner is a labourer and for differences on payment of wages, he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The petitioner has clean antecedent. Considering the clean antecedent, facts and circumstance of the case, the prayer of bail is allowed and the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60623 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Sadar (M) Police Station Case No. 471 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of offence in future, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail. (Sanjay Kumar, J) Mahesh/- U T