Manish Mishra @ Manish Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49220 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== Manish Mishra @ Manish Kumar Mishra S/o Sir Kant Mishra, R/o Civil Line, Hospital Road, P.S.- Bxuar (Town), District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Shukla For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Manish Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for O.P. No. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 7.7.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49220 of 2018(2) dt.09-08-2018 2/2 dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Buxar in connection with Buxar (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 18/2016.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T