← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2474/2016disposed

Chandrabhan Nath Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-31Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2474 of 2016 ====================================================== Chandrabhan Nath Tiwary, Son of Sri Dwarika Nath Tiwary resident of village- Chitarwal, Post- Gudani, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Siwan.

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Siwan.

6. The District Education Officer, Siwan.

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Siwan.

8. The Block Education Officer, Mairwa, District- Siwan.

9. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj English, Block- Mairwa, District- Siwan.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj English, Block- Mairwa, District- Siwan.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Roy, AC to GP11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by the order dated 16.9.2015 passed in CWJC No. 19090 of 2012. Without going into the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-authorities to examine the case of the petitioner and if it is found that the case of the petitioner is identical to the case of the petitioner of

Patna High Court CWJC No.2474 of 2016(2) dt.31-01-2018 2/2 CWJC No. 19090 of 2012, the respondents are required to pass appropriate order extending the same benefit to this petitioner. Such exercise must be completed within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U