Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55057/2017bail granted

Khushbu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55057 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55057 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -246 Year- 2017 Thana -BIHARIGANJ District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Khushbu Kumari wife of Jaglal Besra resident of village - Jouteli Santhali Tola, Ward No. 14, P.S. Bihariganj, District - Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saket Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 246 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 6 litres of liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody for last three months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner is a lady and has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55057 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Udakishunganj, in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 246 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of her bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T