Patna High CourtCWJC/19786/2016disposed

Md. Mukhtar Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19786 of 2016 =========================================================== Md. Mukhtar Ahmad Son of Late Md. Quamruddin Ansari Resident of VillageBrahampur, P.S. Phulparas, District-Madhubani, the Secretary of Madarsa Islamia Muslim Chawk, Brahampur, P.S. Phulparas, District-Madhubani (Madarsa No. 786) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Special Director Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna through its Secretary

3. The Chairman of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna

4. The Secretary of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Vidyapati Marg, Patna

5. The District Education Officer, Madhubani

6. The Managing Committee of the Madarsa Islamia Muslim Chawk, Brahampur, P.S. Phulparas, Distt. Madhubani through its Secretary, Alhaj Islamul Haque

7. Md. Ebadullah Son of late Ibrus Ansari of Village-Brahampur, P.S. Phulparas District-Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ASHUTOSH RANJAN PANDEY-AAG15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-12-2017 This is an admitted fact that there is provision of appeal under Section 28 of the Bihar State Madarsa Education Board Act, 1981 against the impugned action. In that background learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the appellate authority.

It is indicated that if any question of limitation arises before

Patna High Court CWJC No.19786 of 2016 dt.06-12-2017 2/2 the appellate authority, the authority shall keep in mind the fact that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this court by filing present application, while considering the petitioner's case for condonation of delay.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Vinita/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date12.12.2017 Transmission Date NA