Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54958/2017bail granted

Santosh Sao @ Santosh Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54958 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54958 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2017 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Santosh Sao @ Santosh Gupta, Son of Jai Prakash Sao, Resident of Village- Chananwar, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kowakole P.S. Case No. 26 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 3950 pouch of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been made accused in this case on confession of co-accused and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and though petitioner is accused in one more case but that has been lodged after arrest in this case. Petitioner has been in custody since 28.07.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54958 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. -II cum Special Judge, Nawada, in connection with Kowakole P.S. Case No. 26 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T