Vikash Chacha @ Vikash Kumar Rai @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No. 573 of 2015 =================================================== Vikash Chacha @ Vikash Kumar Rai @ Vikash Kumar S/o Narad Rai Under the Natural Guardiun ship of His father Namely Narad Rai S/o Sri Ishwar Rai Resident of Village - Sareya Bhitaha, Ps Paharpur, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satyavrat Verma (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
04. 24.09.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
This revision application has been filed for setting aside the judgment and order dated 23.06.2015 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari in Cr. Appeal No. 65 of 2015, by which he has affirmed the order dated 24.04.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, East Champaran at Motihari, by which he has refused to release the Petitioner in Paharpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015 (G.R. No. 375 of 2015, Tr. No. 822 of 2015).
Considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to release the Petitioner. The prayer for release is rejected. Since there is every possibility that the Petitioner may associate himself with anti social elements, the Juvenile Justice Board is directed to expedite the enquiry and conclude the same positively within a period of six months
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.573 of 2015 (4) dt.24-09-2015 from the date of receipt of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. For this reason, he is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order, to the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari, and the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial.
Let case diary be remitted to the Court below immediately.
The Revision Application stands dismissed with the aforesaid observations.
Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T