Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62515 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2015 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Vijay Kumar S/o Late Rajendra Prasad, R/o Village- Tehta, P.S.- Tehta, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. SRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 03-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected thrice vide order dated 18.01.2016, 10.08.2016 and 26.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 48308 of 2015, 30305 of 2016 and 23161 of 20176 respectively on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2015, he has been made victim of circumstances, no one has seen him committing the crime and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. There was direction to conclude the trial within four months but the trial has not been concluded and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. Learned APP fairly submits that the trial has not been concluded within four months as granted by this Court. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62515 of 2017(2) dt.03-01-2018 2/2 above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge VII, Gaya in S. Tr. No. 08 of 2016 arising out of Rampur P. S. Case No. 92 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T