Priyank Kumar Upadhyay @ Priyank Upadhyay v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19999 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2026 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Priyank Kumar Upadhyay @ Priyank Upadhyay S/o Vijay Upadhyay R/o Village - Manoharpur, P.S - Itarhi, District - Buxar 2.
Shubham Upadhyay S/o Shashibhushan Upadhyay R/o Village - Manoharpur, P.S - Itarhi, District - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Alias Ashok Karn, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 50, 61(2), 103(1), 351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Kanhaiya Chaubey and others had gone to the place of occurrence for harvesting agricultural field forcibly and in that process, Kanhaiya Chaubey fired and killed the deceased. The petitioners and other accused persons are said to have assaulted the prosecution side causing injuries to four persons.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19999 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/2
4. The petitioners are in custody since 08.01.2026.
5. Considering the allegation and the materials on record, it appears that the petitioners had participated in the crime after being fully armed.
6. In view of the above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T