Patna High CourtMJC/586/2016disposed

Shiv Rani Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through Thechief Secretary And ORS

2017-12-07Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.586 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 430 of 2015 ====================================================== Shiv Rani Devi, wife of Late Ram Tahal Sahu, resident of village- Bhelura Rampur, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Main Secretariat, Patna

2. Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, name of father not known to the petitioner, Chief Secretary, State of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. S.M. Raj, Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. Mr. Shashi Bhushanj Kumar, Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Indira Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Boring Canal Road, Patna

5. Ravi Mittal, Commissioner and Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mrs. Nutan Sharma, A.C. to G.A.-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of O.P. No.4 in which it is stated that the order under contempt has been fully complied with and the case of the petitioner has been disposed of by means of a reasoned order. What the authorities have failed to notice in the said reasoned order is the earlier order of the Division Bench, which could well have benefited the petitioner, but since there is non-consideration of the same

Patna High Court MJC No.586 of 2016 (9) dt.07-12-2017 2/2 in the said order, it would be open to the petitioner to have the same considered before any other appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

With the aforementioned observations, the contempt application stands disposed of.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U