Harendra Tiwary And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31098 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -354 Year- 2013 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI (HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Harendra Tiwary Son of Late Raghunath Tiwary
2. Shesh Nath Tiwary Son of Late Milan Tiwari Both resident of village - Jalalpur, P.S. Lalganj, District - Vaishali
3. Suman Kumar Pathak Son of Jaichandra Pathak resident of village - Baliya, P.S. Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Meera Kumari Wife of Sri Binodanand Jha resident of village - Harpur Osti, P.S. Mahua, District - Vaishali, Presently resides at Mohalla - Gandhi Chowk Mahua Bazar, P.S. Mahua, District - Vaishali .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2015 Heard both sides.
The petitioners, three in number, apprehend their arrest in a case under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complainant alleged that the marriage of her daughter was settled with Binod Kumar. Engagement ceremony was also performed but before solemnization of marriage, the petitioners began to demand Hero Honda motorcycle and the negotiation was broken. It is submitted that the complainant never came to the house of the petitioners nor was the marriage ever settled with her daughter. No photograph is filed in the court showing ceremony of engagement. The petitioners are father and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31098 of 2015 (2) dt.30-07-2015 2/2 relatives of the bridegroom.
Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali in Complaint Case No. 354/2013, corresponding to Tr. No. 2991/2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Dilip/- U T