← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18047/2025bail rejected

Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-24Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18047 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2025 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Raju Kumar S/o- Rajendra Prasad Village- Near Mohan Cinema Babu Bazar Ps- Nagar Thana Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 190, 191 ( 2 ), 191(3) and 109 of the BNS.

3 . As per the prosecution case , informant, namely Ashish Prakash, alleged that he received a call from his friends that a fight between 15-20 unknown accused persons near Diamond Hotel was going on and insisted him to come to the place of occurrence , and upon such information , when informant went to the spot, accused persons fired upon him, due to which one bullet hit the left side of his neck and other on his hydrocele as a result of which he sustained firearm injury and is undergoing treatment.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18047 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named In the F.I.R. The name of petitioner transpire during course of investigation . No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5 . Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that during course of investigation , it has come that this petitioner opened fire upon informant due to which informant sustained fire arm injury .

6. Considering the material available on record and the fact that petitioner is alleged to have caused firearms injury to the informant, prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T