← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11347/2016dismissed

Hello Message v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.11347 of 2016 dt.12-04-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11347 of 2016 =========================================================== Hello Message, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran through Proprietor-Jagdish Prasad, S/o Late Bindeshwar Sah, R/o village + PO- Mukhtar Khana, Ward No. 16, Narkatiaganj, P.S. Shikarpur, District- West Champaran, Bettiah. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue & Land reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The State Project Officer, Bihar Mahadalit Development Mission, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Motihari, District Motihari.

4. The Addl. Collector, East Champaran, Motihari, District Motihari. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra,Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. NIRBHAY KR. SINGH- GP26 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been taken up out of turn on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner for disposal of the same with a direction to the respondents to pay the admitted dues of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite having completed the data entry work of the Mahadalit Survey Family List, an amount of Rs. 1,97,866/- remains outstanding for payment.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11347 of 2016 dt.12-04-2018

4. At the very outset this Court takes note that the petitioner has approached this Court after an inordinate delay of over nine years for redressal of his grievances, which relates to the year 2009. The petitioner is clearly pursuing a stale claim and is not entitled to relief by this Court in its extra ordinary jurisdiction in view of delay and laches, as no good ground has been stated to explain such delay.

5. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.04.2018 Transmission Date NA