Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Kumar Yadav And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37860 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -193 Year- 2013 Thana -SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSAHARSA ======================================================

1. Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Kumar Yadav son of Harihar Yadav

2. Krishna Kumar Yadav son of Harihar Yadav

3. Ramnaresh Yadav @ Menjan Yadav son of Harihar Yadav

4. Harihar Yadav @ Harihar Prasad Yadav son of Late Bahuri Yadav

5. Kamal Kishor Yadav @ Kamal Kishor @ Shamala Yadav Son of Khasar Yadav

6. Hari Narayan Yadav son of Khasar Yadav

7. Binod Yadav Son of Khasar Yadav All are resident of Village Situaha, Police Station Salkhua, District Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Prabhash Yadav son of Late Tanuk Lal Yadav resident of Village - Situaha, P.S. - Salkhua, District - Saharsa.

.... .... Opposite Partyies ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ashok Kumar I (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-09-2017 Hear d l ear ned Counsel f or t he pet i t i oner s as wel l as t he l ear ned Counsel appear i ng f or t he St at e. The pet i t i oner s seek quashi ng of t he cogni zance or der dat ed 28.10.2013 passed by t he Judi ci al Magi st r at e, l st Cl ass, Sahar sa i n Compl ai nt Case No. 193 (C ) of 2013, t her eby t aki ng cogni zance of t he of f ence under Sect i ons 323, 427 and 506/34 of t he I ndi an Penal Code.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37860 of 2014 (5) dt.01-09-2017 Lear ned Counsel f or t he pet i t i oner s submi t s t hat pr i or t o t he i nst i t ut i on of t he pr esent compl ai nt case t he ot her si de had f i l ed a pol i ce case and t her ef or e t he pr esent compl ai nt case was f i l ed.

Havi ng consi der ed t he sai d submi ssi on t he Cour t f i nds t hat i t i s not t he case t hat t he al l egat i ons r ef er r ed i n t he compl ai nt as wel l as t he mat er i al s dur i ng enqui r y do not make out a case. The def ence of t he accused cannot be a gr ound f or quashi ng t he cr i mi nal pr oceedi ng. Thi s appl i cat i on st ands di smi ssed.

(Arun Kumar, J.) Snkumar/- U T