← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62234/2017bail granted

Kalika Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-15Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62234 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2004 Thana -SIMRA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Kalika Thakur, son of late Ram Prasad Thakur, resident of village- Barheta, P.S.- Deo, District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-01-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Simra P.S.Case No. 16 of 2004 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 324, 332, 341, 353, 379, 382, 427, 435, 436 and 452 of the Indian penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR is lodged against unknown about 150 persons, also charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner in the year 2016 in a case which is of the year 2004 and only material against the petitioner is disclosure of his name by another co-accused Janeshwar Yadav, who has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.06.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62234 of 2017 (2) dt.15-01-2018 2/2 20508 of 2012. Moreover, this petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely , Kalika Thakur, is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Simra P.S. Case No. 16 of 2004, with condition that one of the bailor must be his close family relative. Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any medical urgency, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Arun Kumar, J) Sujit/- U T