Patna High CourtCWJC/2114/2016withdrawn

Kangress Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-12Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2114 of 2016 ====================================================== Kangress Yadav Son of Bulaki Yadav Resident of Village - Pratappur, P.O. - Dulampur, P.S. - Chakai, District - Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger.

4. The District Magistrate, Jamui.

5. The District Education Officer, Jamui.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Jamui.

7. The Block Development Officer, Chakai, District - Jamui.

8. The Block Education Officer, Chakai, District - Jamui.

9. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Jamui through its Chairman.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Dulampur, Chakai, District - Jamui.

11. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dulampur, Chakai, District - Jamui.

12. Md. Arshad Azad Son of Md. Abdul Manan Resident of village - Dulampur, P.S. - Chakai, District - Jamui.

13. Krishna Prasad Yadav Son of Jagarnath Yadav Resident of Village - Chaitardih, P.O. - Dulampur, P.S. - Chakai, District - Jamui.

14. Dinesh Prasad Yadav Son of Sri Bachu Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Katiyama, P.S. - Dulampur, P.S. - Chakai, District - Jamui. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Smt. Shashi Priya Pathak, Advocate Preety Kunwar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. U. S. S. Singh- Gp1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 12-01-2018 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to approach the State Appellate Authority.

In case, such appeal is filed within one month from

Patna High Court CWJC No.2114 of 2016 (2) dt.12-01-2018 2/2 today, the State Appellate Authority is required to examine the case of the petitioner and decide the same on its own merit after condoning the delay in filing of the appeal in view of the fact that the writ petition is pending since 2016.

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U