Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61795/2017bail granted

Sumitra Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-19Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61795 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2017 Thana -RISHIUP District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Sumitra Devi, W/o Ganga Prasad Kushwaha,

2. Ganga Prasad Kushwaha @ Ganga Prasad, S/o Chumru Mahto, Both resident of Village- Risiup, P.S. Risiup, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Rishiup P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B, 201/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are father in law and mother in law of the deceased.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Rishiup P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61795 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 Case No. 64 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T