← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5576/2023dismissed

Gautam Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-26Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5576 of 2023 ====================================================== Gautam Choudhary Son of Late Ramlakhan Choudhary, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Parsagarh, Police Station-Ekma, District-Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar Patna. 2.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Health Development Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna.

3.

The Chief Medical Officer, Health Center, Saran. 4.

The Medical Officer, in-Charge Primary Health Center, Ekma, Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shrinath Manjhi, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Birju Prasad ( GP-13 ) Mr. Ravi Kumar, AC to GP-13 Mr. Ajit Anand, AC to GP-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. I. For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to consider the claims of the petitioner as per the provision of law or any other appropriate writ order or direction.

II. For issuance to pay regarding nonpayment of outstanding salary dated 28.11.2003 to 30.09.2007.

III. For issuance to pay the interest amount of salary dated 28.11.2003 to

Patna High Court CWJC No.5576 of 2023(2) dt.26-02-2024 2/2 30.09.2007 which was granted time to time and pay its difference of arrear of the following or its consequential benefit.

IV. For issuance to pay the nonpayment of salary dated 28.11.2003 to 30.09.2007 which was not given by the respondents till date and its may be granted by the respondents authority and it may be corrected by the respondents authority. "

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U