Buta Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62229 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -368 Year- 2013 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Buta Paswan S/o Tarachand Paswan, R/o Village- Tikri more, P.S.- Aurangabad (T), District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 03-01-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected five times vide orders dated 24.03.2014, 18.02.2015, 17.02.2016, 22.02.2017 and 13.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 906 of 2014, 41590 of 2014, 53054 of 2015, 7278 of 2017 and 43475 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 30.08.2013 and up till now the trial has not been concluded and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail. In near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that by order

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62229 of 2017 (2) dt.03-01-2018 2/2 dated 13.09.2017 the trial court was directed to conclude the trial within a period of two months but the trial has not been concluded. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Aurangabad in connection with S. Trial No. 196 of 2014/ 46 of 2014 arising out of Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No. 368 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T