Anand Parmar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20456 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2019 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== ANAND PARMAR Son of Sri Dhirendra Pratap Singh @ Dinesh Parmar Resident of Village - Baradhi, P.S.- Chand, Distt - Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Archana Devi Wife of Late Arun Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Piyankala, P.S.- Chenari, Distt - Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-09-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 149 of 2019, registered for offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

There is allegation of demand of dowry against the petitioner and in-laws and there is also allegation of torturing due to non-fulfillment of dowry of demand.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20456 of 2020(10) dt.20-09-2022 2/3 The matter was referred to Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for exploring the possibility of amicable solution of the dispute. The report of Mediation Centre dated 08.09.2022 is available with the record, which shows that after great persuasion, both the parties agreed to live separately and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 12,50,000/- and jewellery for final settlement to opposite party no. 2. Opposite party no. 2 accepted the offer and gave her consent for finally compromise of the case pending in the court of learned Principal Judge Family Court, Kaimur at Bhabua in Matrimonial Case No. 20 of 2018. The mode of payment of amount was agreed to be as demand draft/cheque/cash before the learned Principal Judge Family Court, Kaimur at Bhabua in Matrimonial Case No. 20 of 2018.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, District Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 149 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20456 of 2020(10) dt.20-09-2022 3/3 If the petitioner does not stand to his words, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T