Kumari Devi Leela @ Devi Leela Kumari @ Mata Kumari Devi Leela @ Devi Mata Kumari And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31839 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -190 Year- 2015 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ======================================================
1. Kumari Devi Leela @ Devi Leela Kumari @ Mata Kumari Devi Leela @ Devi Mata Kumari , Wife of Yaduvansh Ojha.
2. Kamlakar Ojha Son of Yaduvansh Ojha, both residents of villageAmarpur, P.S.- Dhansoi, District- Buxar. At present residing of VillageAdarsh Nagar, Ambedkar Chowk, P.S.- Buxar (T), District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Buxar Nagar P.S. Case No. 190 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the informant is stated to have paid an amount of Rs. 40,00,000/- to one Heera Kumar Trigun for purchase of some property in Varanasi, which property is said, to be sold to some one else by said Heera Kumar Trigun and his wife Archana Trigun.
Learned counsel for the petitioners appears to be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31839 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 2/3 prima facie right in his submission that the petitioner no. 1, who is mother-in-law of said Heera Kumar Trigun and petitioner no. 2, who is son of petitioner no. 1 have been implicated in order to put undue pressure for recovery of the amount, which the informant is said to have paid to said Heera Kumar Trigun and Archana Trigun.
In view of the nature of allegation, I consider it appropriate to grant the petitioners the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar Nagar P.S. Case No. 190 of 2015, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31839 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 3/3 appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall liable to be cancelled.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Vats/- U T