Jai Govind Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46264 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -242 Year- 2017 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Jai Govind Singh Son of Mahesh Singh, R/o Village- Dumdum , P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2017 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S.Case No.242 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is of firing on the deceased causing death Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the informant does not appear to be eye witness of the case and even the prosecution case is believed it is not corroborated by the other persons, as it has come in the case diary and also from the self-confession of the co-accused and there are some other manner of the occurrence in the case. The petitioner is in custody
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46264 of 2017 (3) dt.07-11-2017 2/2 since long.
Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant stating that the manner of the occurrence as alleged in the FIR supported the case and the post mortem report also shows that the injuries have been found on the person of the deceased. Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, as such the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected , however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the commitment of the case and after commitment, he shall expedite the trial of the case.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T