Akhatar Shah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18371 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- PARSATHUA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Akhatar Shah Son of Late Ramjan Shah Resident of Village - Parasathua, P.S. - Parsathua, Dist. - Rohtas.
2.
Mumtaz Shah @ Mumtaz Son of Late Ramjan Shah Resident of Village - Parasathua, P.S. - Parsathua, Dist. - Rohtas. 3.
Shahid Shah @ Kalu Shah Son of Mumtaj Shah Resident of Village - Parasathua, P.S. - Parsathua, Dist. - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 303(2), 352, 329(4), 324(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 28.06.2025, on account of heavy rain, water started logging at her door. Further, her neighbour Akhtar started filling mud in order to stop the flow of the water. On
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18371 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/3 objection by her husband, the accused persons started abusing and assaulting her husband and when informant and her son came to save him, the accused assaulted them.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant and petitioners are neighbour and on account of dispute relating to water logging, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is next submitted that allegation of assault is not specific rather is general and omnibus in nature and petitioners are not criminals.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18371 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 3/3 Parasthua P. S. Case No.64 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T