← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51334/2018bail granted

Meghu Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-14Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51334 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2018 Thana -RISIYAP District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Meghu Singh Son of Late Janki Singh

2. Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Singh Son of Late Ramautar Singh

3. Amarjeet Kumar Son of Mahendra Singh All are residents of Barka Gaon Bisaini, P.S. Risiup, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-09-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Risiup P.S. Case No. 45 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and others.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been made accused on the background of land dispute and though there is allegation of assault, injuries sustained by the informant and others were found to be simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51334 of 2018 (2) dt.14-09-2018 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Risiup P.S. Case No. 45 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T