Ranjana Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7156 of 2016 ====================================================== Ranjana Kushwaha wife of Shri Amrendra Kumar, resident of Village- Bania Chhapar and Post- Koiladewa, Block and Anchal- Fulwaria, Police StationFulwaria, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrate Child Development Scheme ICDS, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chhapra. 4.

The Deputy Director, Welfare Department, Saran Division, Chhapra. 5.

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Gopalganj.

7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Fulwaria Block, DistrictGopalganj. 8.

Bindu Devi, wife of Awadh Kishore Sah, resident of Village- Bania Chhapar and Post- Koiladewa, Block and Anchal- Fulwaria, Police Station- Fulwaria, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manohar Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.GP-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2023

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application on behalf of petitioner for issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing of the order dated 18.12.2012 passed in Anganbari Appeal case no. 46/12 by Respondent no. 5 by which the order passed by respondent no.7 vide memo no.263 dated 13.07.2012 has been held to be not in accordance with law and appointment of petitioner as Aanganbari Sevika has been cancelled and

Patna High Court CWJC No.7156 of 2016(2) dt.12-10-2023 2/2 petitioner further prays for quashing of the order dated 17.01.2015 passed by respondent no.3 in Aanganbari Appeal no.51/2013 along with other analogous cases by which all the appeals have been dismissed only on the ground of jurisdiction."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court, having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U