Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55446 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -103 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAJEKALA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Rohit Kumar Son of Pappu Gupta @ Ohmkar Nath Gupta, Resident of Mohalla - Maharani Ki Deorhi, P.S. Khajekalan, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rudal Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
The FIR of the occurrence of murder is against unknown.
Learned Public Prosecutor submits that there is no eye-witness before the police during investigation. Only circumstance against the petitioner is that he had carried the victim for treatment and subsequently it was informed that the petitioner and others were the real assailants and to save their skin, they had carried the victim. Besides the aforesaid, there is confession of co-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55446 of 2017 (3) dt.04-01-2018 2/2 accused before the police implicating the petitioner also. For the purpose of bail, the aforesaid are no material to refuse the prayer. Hence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Khajekalan Police Station Case No. 103 of 2017, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T