← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6883/2016dismissed

Kumar Pramod v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-19Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6883 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Kumar Pramod son of Late Achhelal Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Chak Ahmad Bhikhanpura, P.S. Sadar District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Energy Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. M.D. North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Patna

3. General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Tirhut Area, ELectricity-2 Board, Muzaffarpur

4. Superintending Engineer Electricity Board, Circle Ganipur, Muktinath Temple, Ram Dayalu Nagar, District- Muzaffarpur

5. Executive Engineer, Electricity Board, Supply Division (West), Bhaghwanpur, P.S. Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur

6. Assistant Engineer, Electricity Board, Sub-Division Bhagwanpur, District- Muzaffarpur

7. Amod Kumar son of Late Achhelal Sah, Mohalla- Chak Ahmad Bhikhanpura, P.S. Sadar District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, S.C.2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 A counter affidavit is being filed, let it be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

A tug of war between the siblings on the compassionate appointment given to the younger son, is put to question in this writ petition.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in my opinion, it is entirely at the discretion of the widow and the request made by her in this regard which is a relevant factor for such

Patna High Court CWJC No.6883 of 2016 (2) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 consideration and in case the request has gone in favour of the younger son, the petitioner being elder of the two, can raise no such grievance to question the same.

The writ petition lacks merit as well as foundation, which is dismissed accordingly.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U